Scientific Peer Review with AI
Use AI to review a scientific claim, study summary or evidence note like a careful peer reviewer.

Prompt

Act as a careful scientific peer reviewer for the claim, study summary or evidence note below. Be clear about what the evidence supports, what it does not support and what would need checking before anyone relies on it.

Claim or study summary:
[PASTE CLAIM OR SUMMARY]

Field or topic:
[TOPIC]

Audience:
[AUDIENCE]

Known source details:
[AUTHOR, DATE, JOURNAL, LINK OR UNKNOWN]

Please include:
- plain-English summary
- main claim being made
- evidence type
- strengths
- weaknesses
- missing context
- possible bias or conflict of interest
- questions a reviewer would ask
- what would need independent checking
- cautious conclusion
- confidence level

Example Input

Claim: a new AI tool improves small business productivity by 40 percent. Topic: AI productivity software. Audience: small business owners. Source details: vendor report, date known, no independent replication found yet.

Example Output

A peer-review style assessment that separates the claim, evidence strength, gaps, possible bias, review questions and cautious conclusion.

Before you ask

Add the claim or study summary, topic, audience and any source details you know. Say if the source is a vendor, article, paper or unknown.

Check before use

Check that the answer separates what the evidence shows from what is guessed, overstated or still unverified.

Common mistakes

Treating one confident-sounding claim as settled evidence without checking source quality, missing context or independent support.

Useful for:

Research

Works well with:

ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot
Nova9 Tools

Need an idea or a better prompt?

Generate fresh ideas first, or go straight to the Prompt Builder if you already know what you want to create.

Open Ideas Builder Open Prompt Builder